求高手通俗解答！无级变速和手自一体有何区别？那种好？小女子无助求解！_百度知道
求高手通俗解答！无级变速和手自一体有何区别？那种好？小女子无助求解！
我有更好的答案
手自一体只是在自动挡的基础上增加了人为换挡的功能而已 本质还是自动挡 无极变速器也可以实现手自一体
汽车选购顾问
这个问题外行了
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
吉尼斯中国之夜的相关知识
换一换
回答问题，赢新手礼包
个人、企业类
违法有害信息,请在下方选择后提交
色情、暴力
我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。已解决问题
请问生意经的朋友求高手解答一下压花与烂花的区别求解答
压花烂花有什么区别啊,从成品和生产过程帮忙分析一下吧先谢谢啦。[本帖最后由zhuyiliang于:13编辑]
浏览次数：474
用手机阿里扫一扫
最满意答案
压花市通过物理手段(高温+钢辊)在织物表面形成花型,花型不耐水洗。烂花是通过化学手段,通过助剂与织物表面反应形成花型,耐水洗。
答案创立者
以企业身份回答&
正在进行的活动
生意经不允许发广告，违者直接删除
复制问题或回答，一经发现，拉黑7天
快速解决你的电商难题
店铺优化排查提升2倍流量
擅长&nbsp 店铺优化
您可能有同感的问题
扫一扫用手机阿里看生意经
问题排行榜
当前问题的答案已经被保护，只有知县（三级）以上的用户可以编辑！写下您的建议，管理员会及时与您联络！
server is ok后使用快捷导航没有帐号？
本贴相关题目
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.
However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.
Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.
Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
Asome celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available&&Bthe price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals&&Ca customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering&&Da restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer&&Ewith enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables&&
正确答案: C
更多相关帖子
查看: 3955|回复: 9
在线时间 小时
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. &However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. &Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. &Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables答案c的意思不是不逗留的意思，为什么是正确选项？求解
在线时间 小时
Lingering here is a noun, not an adjective. So lingering means sojourn, tarriance, or plainly, stay.What C) says is:a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table (stay longer to view celebrities) would be an exception to the generalization about lingering (diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables).As to stay longer to see the celebrities part, it is just common sense, albeit a tricky one.C) does not attack premises. C) simply points out that both premises cannot be valid at the same time for the conclusion to hold. Individually, both premises are correct. But when you combine the two premises together, you cannot get the conclusion the argument tries to reach.
在线时间 小时
Premises:1) Customers come to Hollywood Restaurant to watch the celebrities so customrs would prefer tall tables to get a better view.2) Diners seated on stools typically stay a shorter time than diners on regular seats.Conclusion:If the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.Basically, the argument says that stools would attract more customers and customers sitting on stools turn over quickly. &Therefore, profits would be up. &Wait a minute. &Based on premise 1, if the customers are attracted to the restaraunt because they want to see celebrities, shouldn't they stay LONGER than normal customers? If so, it runs contrary to premise 2 which describes a general trend in customer's lingering behavior. The customer attracted might sit on the stools for a LONNNNNNNNNNNNNNG time without spending much on food. No turnover, no money!C points out this paradox and C is the correct answer.
在线时间 小时
Agree to 另外我是这么下手的，看问题。你看这个问题问的很诡异，说本题目题设中可以退出什么来反驳本题的观点。。。。。。如前所说两个题设，1看名人 2吃的快翻台子，所以因为1，2，这么搞肯定赚大发了于是，你把题设反过来（否定题设），然后排列组合一下，就有以下可能：1如果来个鸟人，只吃不看，那么餐馆应该还是赚钱，翻台子啊2如果来个鸟人，只看不吃，那么餐馆就翻不了台子，餐馆就难赚钱3如果来个鸟人，不吃也不看，我觉得这个人可以去撞墙了，因为没必要来这个餐馆，多余。。。。。所以，只有2能够达到从题设推个东西否定本题。1无法否定，3不存在这样想撞墙的人
在线时间 小时
LS, good job in translating this problem in simple Chinese.
在线时间 小时
你的分析厉害，但考场有限时间不一定想这么多
在线时间 小时
看来是我没把问题理解透
在线时间 小时
体会所得：由两个或多个premises推出一个conclusion,留意这些premises内部矛盾，正是这些&自相矛盾&是最好的weaken方法。
在线时间 小时
我觉得二楼说的很好 但是很多人可能有些地方还是有点难理解我自己的一些领悟 &欢迎大家探讨其实我觉得这道题之所以难 &是因为有些句子比较难理解这道题的提问很关键：The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that这里的it指代的是argument，即问作者的推断过程有理由使我们相信很有可能咋样，而这个“咋样”会成为批评者的理由来反对作者的逻辑推理（即我们要找作者推理的自相矛盾的地方）作者的推断二楼说了Premises:1) Customers come to Hollywood Restaurant to watch the celebrities so customrs would prefer tall tables to get a better view.2) Diners seated on stools typically stay a shorter time than diners on regular seats.Conclusion:If the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.A,B 选项都是讲名人咋样 &文章中根据premise与conclusion是推不出来的C选项讲顾客坐长凳可能做的时间长 &与generalization相反，这一点我们promise1 是可以推出因为要看明星D选项不仅从argument推不出来 &而还与之相反E选项也推不出个人感觉有点infer题得意思在里面逻辑题的提问和结论都很重要！修饰语 结构多留神
在线时间 小时
分享一下教训，读完题印象最深的是三件事，profits would increase，vulnerable to criticism，题目只说了翻台时间快没说每一台的利润。提到餐饮的profits怎么能只说流量（翻台快就是流量大咯）不说单位收入呢，没有收入谈什么profits？所以很自然的就去答案里面找跟金额相关的，看到只有d选项说用餐时间短的点东西也便宜就选了，一看答案懵逼了。。。
看了楼上的分析发现问题都没读懂。这个问题其实给了一个限制就是只能从题目的两个推理前提出发（这里就表示不用琢磨收入了，当然了d也不对，说expensive跟profit也没关系）
所属分类: GMAT考试
正在浏览此版块的会员 ()
ChaseDream 论坛
All Rights Reserved.查看: 1956|回复: 4
求高手解答，URL录制方式，和HTML录制区别，什么时候用
该用户从未签到
今天在录制脚本时用html（web_submit_data）进行自动关联lr挂了，用url的没挂，我用的9.5.请那位高手解答怎么选这两种录制方式
该用户从未签到
是选择HTML还是URL录制，有以下参考原则：
（1）基于浏览器的应用程序推荐使用HTML-based script。
（2）不是基于浏览器的应用程序推荐使用URL-based script。
（3）如果基于浏览器的应用程序中包含了JavaScript并且该脚本向服务器产生了请求，比如DataGrid的分页按& &&&钮等，也要使用URL-based script方式录制。
（4）基于浏览器的应用程序中使用了HTTPS安全协议，使用URL-based script方式录制。
该用户从未签到
该用户从未签到
一般来说如果是标准使用IE访问的B/S架构，应使用HTML-BASE下的A script containing explicit URLs only方式来录制脚本，这种脚本基于URL请求完成，不会带有任何前后依赖的内容。而如果是一个非IE标准的C/S架构的，建议使用URL-BASE Script来录制脚本，这样可确保不会遗漏任何HTTP请求
该用户从未签到
不是web 的直接用 url方式&&
是web的，当html方式失败的时候，就改用url方式。
有些页面中的技术，当你不完全了解时，就这样试试就行。
站长推荐 /2
了解自己的心里圈，学习不同的内容，让自己由内而外强大起来！
缺乏亮眼的项目经验？面试“BAT”没信心？升职加薪无望？——《大型电商项目自动化测试框架开发》直播课，手把手教你写框架开发，6.28开课！
Powered by报名考试等级报错了，四六级报名预报名审核通过但是没有缴费和现场确认，能修改考试等级吗?求高手解答。_百度知道
报名考试等级报错了，四六级报名预报名审核通过但是没有缴费和现场确认，能修改考试等级吗?求高手解答。
我有更好的答案
如果你过四级再报的也是四级,没关系,当刷分了.可以再报六级,反正四六级考试时间不冲突.如果你没过四级是报不上六级的.总之,审核通过的是不能再改的.
采纳率：40%
能，只要没有缴费
就是在你报名的那个网站就可以
为您推荐：
其他类似问题
您可能关注的内容
四六级的相关知识
换一换
回答问题，赢新手礼包
个人、企业类
违法有害信息,请在下方选择后提交
色情、暴力
我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。